The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (IFRS S1 and S2) embed proportionality, enabling SMEs to produce decision-useful ESG disclosures without incurring undue cost or complexity. Two mechanisms drive this: (1) reliance on reasonable and supportable information available at the reporting date, and (2) methods commensurate with resources, such as qualitative scenario analysis and narrative disclosure of anticipated financial effects.
This approach addresses global policy priorities (OECD, G20) and aligns with Hong Kong’s move toward IFRS adoption, ensuring interoperability with frameworks like the EU’s VSME. For SMEs, proportionality means faster compliance, improved access to capital, supply-chain resilience, and operational efficiency. It’s not a free pass—it’s a scalable pathway to full compliance and competitive advantage.
Think ESG reporting is only for big corporations? Think again. The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards—IFRS S1 (General Requirements) and IFRS S2 (Climate)—bake in proportionality so smaller businesses can publish decision‑useful sustainability information without hiring a platoon of consultants or standing up enterprise systems on day one. That design choice isn’t a footnote; it’s the feature that makes a global baseline usable for the businesses that power most economies. IFRS Foundation factsheet, Jan 2025 | PwC Viewpoint summary of ISSB webcasts, Feb 2025
SMEs are being asked for ESG data by banks, insurers, and large customers who’ve made climate and sustainability commitments of their own. Without a practical pathway, smaller firms risk losing contracts and paying more for capital—not because they’re unwilling, but because reporting has felt out of reach. International policy work recognizes this: the G20/OECD has called out the need for sustainability reporting that works for SMEs and emerging markets, and European authorities introduced a simplified Voluntary SME Standard (VSME) to ease value‑chain frictions. The message is consistent: keep proportionality and scalability front and center. OECD for G20 SFWG (2024) policy note | World Bank/Accountancy Europe deck on SME proportional approach (Mar 2025)
Against this backdrop, the ISSB’s proportionality mechanisms are not an afterthought; they are central to making S1/S2 feasible for all companies, including SMEs in developing markets. IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | KPMG overview of proportionality/scalability
1) Use “reasonable and supportable information… without undue cost or effort.”
When information is hard or costly to obtain, you are expected to use relevant and appropriate data that’s already available at the reporting date—and explicitly not to conduct exhaustive searches. Examples include using utility bills for energy, fuel invoices for fleet emissions, HR records for workforce metrics, and supplier attestations or spend-based estimates for selected Scope 3 categories. The standard asks for a balanced judgment between effort and investor benefit. IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | ISSB webcast explainer
2) Apply methods “commensurate with skills, capabilities and resources.”
Your methods can match your maturity. That could mean a qualitative climate scenario analysis in year one (instead of complex modeling), and qualitative disclosure of anticipated financial effects when quantification would require skills or systems you don’t yet have. The standards anticipate that your capacity—and your disclosures—scale up over time. IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | PwC Viewpoint summary
Key takeaway: proportionality doesn’t lower the bar; it builds a ramp.
The IFRS Foundation has summarized where these mechanisms apply. For SMEs, four areas are especially helpful:
Myth 1: “We must quantify everything on day one.”
Not so. IFRS S2 allows qualitative scenario analysis and qualitative anticipated financial effects when quantification would require undue cost or specialized skills you don’t yet have—so long as the narrative is decision‑useful and you commit to improving. IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | PwC Viewpoint
Myth 2: “Scope 3 is impossible for SMEs.”
You’re expected to start with reasonable, supportable methods—supplier questionnaires, spend‑based estimates, and narrower focus on the most material categories—then enhance over time. IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | KPMG guide
Myth 3: “These are big‑company frameworks.”
S1/S2 are globally applicable and intentionally scalable. IFRS S1 even instructs companies to consider SASB Standards to identify industry‑specific topics—an efficient way for SMEs to focus on what’s financially material in their sector. IFRS SASB Standards page | KPMG on SASB in IFRS S1
Days 1–15: Define scope and material topics
Sketch your business model and value chain; shortlist sustainability‑related risks/opportunities that could affect cash flows, access to finance, or resilience. Use SASB sector guidance as a starting compass. IFRS SASB Standards page | KPMG—SASB in S1
Days 16–45: Collect “reasonable and supportable” data
Pull utility bills (Scope 2), fuel invoices (Scope 1), procurement spend + supplier declarations (priority Scope 3), and HR records (workforce). Document estimates and why they’re reasonable. IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | ISSB webcast
Days 46–60: Run a qualitative climate scenario analysis
Pick two plausible scenarios (e.g., orderly transition vs. delayed transition). Map exposure channels—input costs, policy changes, customer demand—and explain your response (supplier diversification, route optimization, equipment upgrades). IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | PwC Viewpoint
Days 61–75: Draft to the four pillars
Days 76–90: Get feedback and publish
Share a concise draft with your bank and two key customers. Ask: “Is this decision‑useful? What would make it more so next year?” Incorporate feedback, then publish—explicitly noting where you applied proportionality and how you’ll scale. KPMG—transition and first‑year reliefs | PwC Viewpoint—climate‑first application support
A regional food distributor with 140 employees needs to keep a major supermarket client. Using proportionality, it:
The result: decision‑useful insight now, with a commitment to add intensity KPIs and refine Scope 3 next year—the iterative, capacity‑building pathway the standards envision. IFRS Proportionality Factsheet | KPMG transition pathway
The ISSB’s proportionality approach aligns closely with policy moves to avoid SME overload while improving informational comparability. Europe’s VSME offers a modular, simplified structure designed primarily for business‑partner information needs and intended to be interoperable with the global baseline. Meanwhile, the OECD is working toward a core set of indicators that satisfy banks and supply chains without imposing full large‑company reporting burdens. Translation: reporting proportionately to IFRS S1/S2 is increasingly recognized across borders. World Bank/Accountancy Europe VSME summary | OECD SME reporting convergence
Proportionality is a ramp, not an exemption. The ISSB expects you to use what’s reasonable today, make transparent judgments, and ratchet up sophistication over time. That’s exactly what investors and customers want: comparable information that improves each year. Start with one material topic, one core metric, and one improvement you’ll deliver in 12 months. Publish the plan. Then iterate.
Ready to move? Drop “Proportionality” in the comments if you want a one‑page checklist and template to publish your first proportionate IFRS S1/S2 disclosure this quarter.
Note: This article provides general information and does not replace reading and applying the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards themselves.
Leave a Reply